TCPA Regulations Continue to Allow Political Robocalls
Additional laws have been added to the TCPA, but political robocalls are not effected and will be an important part of the 2012 election year
On February 15, 2012, the FCC passed new regulations that add to the protections invoked by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA). If you’ve ever tried to read these things, you likely know why it’s sat on my desk for four months before writing this blog post.
The new regulations offers consumers greater protection against unwanted autodialed or prerecorded telemarketing calls known as voice broadcast or robocalls.
Of course, you should not rely on this post for legal advice. Always consult with your own attorney for legal advice. Legal disclaimer aside, here is a summary of the rules and regulations that have been added.
- Prior express written consent is required for all autodialed or prerecorded telemarketing calls to wireless numbers or landlines.
- The established business relationship exemption is removed.
- Call recipients must have the ability to opt-out of future robocalls during the robocall itself.
- Prerecorded calls to residential lines made by health care-related entities governed by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 are exempt from the rulings.
- No changes are made to reduce the ability to use robocalls for prerecorded messages for tax-exempt non-profit organizations, political robocalls, or calls for non-commercial purposes such as school closings.
- Calls to wireless phones, however, still have to obtain prior written permission if the robocalls are made on behalf of non-profits, politicals, or information only purposes.
- Prerecorded voice broadcast calls must state the identity of the business, individual, or other entity responsible for making the call at the beginning of the message. A telephone number of the entity making the calls must be provided at some point during the call.
FCC Enhances Prohibitions Against Business Robocalls to Consumers
The FCC has enhanced the strength of the 1991 TCPA by requiring a written opt-in from all businesses wanting to use telemarketing. The problem is that with VOIP, calls can be made from virtually anywhere in the world for almost no cost. While limitations can be made on domestic businesses, there is virtually nothing that can be done to prevent international VOIP telemarketing calls to our phones.
Not saying that this is a bad law in preventing unwanted robocalls to consumers, but there’s simply no way to stop the international VOIP companies that will be pummeling our landline and mobile phones.
http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-strengthens-consumer-protections-against-telemarketing-robocalls-0
There are no changes to the rules that permit non-profits and political candidates from making robocalls to USA consumers. Don’t you love that the people who make the laws carved out themselves and the non-profits from the original robocalls legislation.
As they say in England: “brilliant.”
Rules for Political Telemarketing
It is a big election year and many political candidates will be using our voice broadcast, or “robocalls,” to reach voters. The question came up as to how the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 fits in with political candidates. You probably know that political candidates are given more leeway when it comes to outbound telemarketing without a bonafied opt-in.
Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, politicians and campaign volunteers may call voters on their landline or wireless phones. But when a campaign uses an auto dialer to leave a “robocall” (precorded message), calls to wireless phones are prohibited. In short, it is:
- legal for a campaign to call voters on their landline phones using an auto dialer to leave a robocall without the “prior express consent of the called party.”
- illegal for a campaign to contact voters using to use auto dialers and robocalls to their cellphones without prior express consent.
The same rules apply to text messages. It is:
- legal for campaign workers to send texts to voters’ cellphones. For this service, political candidates can use text message marketing services such as84444.com.
To learn more about TCPA, please visit the FCC’s websites on telemarketing andSPAM texts.
Please do not consider this legal advice. You should consult your own attorneys to get your own legal opinion.
Recent Posts
- Google Dominates Mobile Ad Revenue
- Wealthier, Higher Educated People Are More Likely to Own An IPhone
- Mobile Ad Spend Predicted to Increase Dramatically by 2017
- Webinar: “Pizza Pies for Mobile Eyes”
- Younger, Wealthier People Are More Likely To Own A Smartphone
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
Categories
- 800 numbers
- 900 numbers
- Canada
- Cell Phone, Technology
- Cell Phones
- Company News
- Cool Stuff
- Credit Card Processing
- Czech Republic
- Dating
- Internet Marketing
- IVR
- Media
- mobile
- Mobile Advertising
- Mobile Apps
- Mobile Coupons
- Mobile Marketing
- Mobile SEO
- Mobile Websites
- Premium SMS
- QR Codes
- Robo Calls
- Search Engine Marketing
- Social Media
- Technology
- Telemedia
- Text Message Marketing
- Text Messaging
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom




